Top terrorism adviser explains use of military on terrorists
Source: bendbulletin
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — John Brennan, the top counterterrorism adviser to President Barack Obama, on Friday defended a broad conception of where the United States can use military force against members of al-Qaida and its allies.
Brennan also denounced a proposal in Congress to mandate military detention of terrorism suspects, even those captured on U.S. soil. His remarks were part of a speech on the administration’s counterterrorism policy and the rule of law, delivered before a conference at Harvard Law School.
Brennan’s remarks about the ability to use military force came against the backdrop of a debate, reported Friday by The New York Times, between lawyers at the State Department and the Pentagon over the limits of military force in places like Yemen and Somalia.
In that region, the State Department has argued, the United States may — as a matter of self-defense — lawfully kill high-level militants who are involved in plots to attack the United States, but not low-level militants who are focused on parochial concerns. The Defense Department has argued that it can attack members of al-Qaida and its allies, although the dispute has remained latent so far because the policy has been to strike at only “high-value individuals.”
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. — John Brennan, the top counterterrorism adviser to President Barack Obama, on Friday defended a broad conception of where the United States can use military force against members of al-Qaida and its allies.
Brennan also denounced a proposal in Congress to mandate military detention of terrorism suspects, even those captured on U.S. soil. His remarks were part of a speech on the administration’s counterterrorism policy and the rule of law, delivered before a conference at Harvard Law School.
Brennan’s remarks about the ability to use military force came against the backdrop of a debate, reported Friday by The New York Times, between lawyers at the State Department and the Pentagon over the limits of military force in places like Yemen and Somalia.
In that region, the State Department has argued, the United States may — as a matter of self-defense — lawfully kill high-level militants who are involved in plots to attack the United States, but not low-level militants who are focused on parochial concerns. The Defense Department has argued that it can attack members of al-Qaida and its allies, although the dispute has remained latent so far because the policy has been to strike at only “high-value individuals.”
Comments