KOLKATA:
A leading human rights watchdog organization has released a report that
puts the blame of rights violations in Maoist conflict zones -
including Jangalmahal - equally on the State and the rebels.
After conducting a year-long study of Maoist conflict zones in the country, Human Rights Watch (HRW) has reasons to believe that the Indian State is equally to blame for rights violations as the Maoists.
After conducting a year-long study of Maoist conflict zones in the country, Human Rights Watch (HRW) has reasons to believe that the Indian State is equally to blame for rights violations as the Maoists.
In a special report, HRW has focused on how residents of Maoist
conflict zones have been forced to live between two sets of guns - one
wielded by the state forces and the other by the rebels. The report
emphasizes how human and civil rights activists have come under attack
in this conflict.
Allegations of rights violations by central forces and police have constantly been doing the rounds in Jangalmahal since the eaconflict's rliest days.
Nearly three years ago, when TOI had written about how security forces paraded Rameswar Murmu, a mentally challenged tribal youth as a hardcore Maoist guerrilla at Duli village, senior police officers had said that it was Maoist ploy.
Similarly, allegations by six women from Sonamukhi village in Jhargram - that members of the security forces had sexually assaulted them - had been rubbished.
Are living between two sets of gun in conflict zones with a special emphasize on how human rights activists and civil rights activists were attacked in this conflict.
The report prepared by HRW quotes an observation by Supreme Court - "The situation in Chhattisgarh is undoubtedly deeply distressing to any reasonable person. What was doubly dismaying to us was the repeated insistence... that the only option for the State was to rule with an iron fist, establish a social order in which... anyone speaking for human rights of citizens [is] to be deemed as suspect, and a Maoist".
The report recommends that the State repeal the colonial-era sedition law and calls for all pending sedition cases to be dropped.
In the extensive study conducted on a period between July 2011 to March 2012 - mainly conducted in central and eastern India on the basis of fact-finding and interviewing grassroots-level civil rights and human activists - HRW found that hundreds of rights activists have been victims of illegal detention, arbitrary arrests, coercion and threats from state-operated police and paramilitary forces.
They interviewed persons like Soni Sori or Himansu Kumar - whose stories of state repression have already came to light. And at the same time several other human right activists were interviewed whose ordeal never reach to outer world. One of them was Rabindra Kumar Majhi of an NGO - Keonjhar Integrated Rural development and Training Insitute in Odhisa - was arrested by police in July 2008 as a Maoist was forced to confess that they were Maoists. On the basis of the fact findings, HRW recomended that the Indian government should instruct officials to not treat the critics of the government and covil society activists as supporters of insurgents, end the practice of filing politically motivated cases.
The report does not give a chit chit to the Maoists, by any means. It strongly condemns the rebels for the brutal killing of villagers, security personnel and even those who had tried to reach out to the remotest corners of the villages with developmental projects.
persons who had been trying to reach out with developmenal projects to the remotest part of the country for the poor people.
It also says that Maoists should end attacks on schools and hospitals and respect international human rights laws.
They also urged the Maoists to make a public commitment to respect the right of expression in the areas where they are dominating.
City-based rights activists welcomed the recommendations. Ranjit Sur, the assistant secretary of Association for Protection of Democratic Rights, pointed out how internationally famed scientist Partho Sarathi Ray had been put behind bars and was subject to "state repression" for protesting against the eviction of settlers in Nonadanga.
In similar bid anti-big dam activist Akhil Gogoi has been branded as Maoist by the Assam government.
Allegations of rights violations by central forces and police have constantly been doing the rounds in Jangalmahal since the eaconflict's rliest days.
Nearly three years ago, when TOI had written about how security forces paraded Rameswar Murmu, a mentally challenged tribal youth as a hardcore Maoist guerrilla at Duli village, senior police officers had said that it was Maoist ploy.
Similarly, allegations by six women from Sonamukhi village in Jhargram - that members of the security forces had sexually assaulted them - had been rubbished.
Are living between two sets of gun in conflict zones with a special emphasize on how human rights activists and civil rights activists were attacked in this conflict.
The report prepared by HRW quotes an observation by Supreme Court - "The situation in Chhattisgarh is undoubtedly deeply distressing to any reasonable person. What was doubly dismaying to us was the repeated insistence... that the only option for the State was to rule with an iron fist, establish a social order in which... anyone speaking for human rights of citizens [is] to be deemed as suspect, and a Maoist".
The report recommends that the State repeal the colonial-era sedition law and calls for all pending sedition cases to be dropped.
In the extensive study conducted on a period between July 2011 to March 2012 - mainly conducted in central and eastern India on the basis of fact-finding and interviewing grassroots-level civil rights and human activists - HRW found that hundreds of rights activists have been victims of illegal detention, arbitrary arrests, coercion and threats from state-operated police and paramilitary forces.
They interviewed persons like Soni Sori or Himansu Kumar - whose stories of state repression have already came to light. And at the same time several other human right activists were interviewed whose ordeal never reach to outer world. One of them was Rabindra Kumar Majhi of an NGO - Keonjhar Integrated Rural development and Training Insitute in Odhisa - was arrested by police in July 2008 as a Maoist was forced to confess that they were Maoists. On the basis of the fact findings, HRW recomended that the Indian government should instruct officials to not treat the critics of the government and covil society activists as supporters of insurgents, end the practice of filing politically motivated cases.
The report does not give a chit chit to the Maoists, by any means. It strongly condemns the rebels for the brutal killing of villagers, security personnel and even those who had tried to reach out to the remotest corners of the villages with developmental projects.
persons who had been trying to reach out with developmenal projects to the remotest part of the country for the poor people.
It also says that Maoists should end attacks on schools and hospitals and respect international human rights laws.
They also urged the Maoists to make a public commitment to respect the right of expression in the areas where they are dominating.
City-based rights activists welcomed the recommendations. Ranjit Sur, the assistant secretary of Association for Protection of Democratic Rights, pointed out how internationally famed scientist Partho Sarathi Ray had been put behind bars and was subject to "state repression" for protesting against the eviction of settlers in Nonadanga.
In similar bid anti-big dam activist Akhil Gogoi has been branded as Maoist by the Assam government.

![Validate my Atom 1.0 feed [Valid Atom 1.0]](valid-atom.png)

