Terrorism in Spain The end of ETA?
THE mise-en-scène chosen by the leaders of ETA, the armed
Basque separatist group, for their video declaration yesterday was very
familiar. Three people wearing floppy Basque berets and white silk
masks with small eyeholes sat at a table in front of flags symbolising
the independent country they want to create. Just like they have done
in every announcement they have made in recent years.
But the
message was radically new. ETA, the spokespeople said, was giving up
the armed fight. It wanted talks with the Spanish and French
governments “with the aim of addressing the resolution of the
consequences of the conflict and, thus, to overcome the armed
confrontation.”
Reaction in the Basque country was, generally,
euphoric. “The nightmare is over,” said Iñigo Urkullu, leader of the
moderate Basque Nationalist Party (PNV), the region's biggest political
party.
So is this the end of more than four decades of separatist
violence in Spain's northerly Basque region? Are ETA and terrorism
finally removed from the national debate?
Not yet. First of all,
there is no guarantee that violence will not reappear under a different
guise. People close to José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, Spain's Socialist
prime minister, know this well. Just as the IRA in Northern Ireland
spawned small breakaway groups determined to stick to terrorism, a small
but still violent “Real ETA” could appear.
And ETA's
declaration, although historic, mentions neither dissolution nor
disarmament. It talks, instead, of how “the recognition of the Basque
country and the respect for the will of the people should prevail over
imposition.” That means ETA will try to use what little weight it still
has to push for self-determination, or a variant thereof—something
Spain's constitution does not envisage.
On Monday a group of
international peace “mediators”, led by former Kofi Annan, the former
UN chief, and including Sinn Fein's Gerry Adams, issued a five-point
declaration on the Basque question. Yesterday ETA said it considered
this “an initiative of enourmous significance”.
But ending the
violence and asking for talks “to address exclusively the consequences
of the conflict” was only one of the five points. The others included
an acceptance by Spain and France of such talks. This has not yet
happened.
Mr Annan's group also suggested “that non-violent
actors and political representatives meet and discuss political and
other related issues, in consultation with the citizenry, that could
contribute to a new era without conflict”. ETA will almost certainly
take that to mean that some of its political complaints must be
addressed. Few Spaniards would agree with them.
Finally, the
members of the Annan group suggested that “international facilitators”
encourage dialogue between ETA and the Spanish government, while they
themselves form a committee “to follow up” their own recommendations.
The
Annan declaration enjoyed backing from the likes of Jimmy Carter and
Tony Blair. It is unlikely that such dignitaries would have lent their
names to the document had it not previously been welcomed (in private)
by Mr Zapatero.
But it will not be Mr Zapatero's job to talk to
ETA. Spain holds a general election on November 20th, which will almost
certainly bring Mariano Rajoy's opposition conservative People's Party
to power.
Mr Rajoy welcomed the end of violence yesterday. But
he also pointed out that Spaniards were “freer today because [ETA's]
announcement came without any kind of political concession.” Spaniards
would not feel fully secure, he warned, until they saw the group's
“irreversible dissolution and dismantling.” But he was vague about how
that might come about.
The best news for Mr Rajoy, apart from the
disappearance of violence, is that the political leaders of the
so-called “Basque separatist left” (as ETA's allies call themselves)
are now firmly ascendant over the men and women of violence. And
although they come from a movement that spurns individual leadership,
preferring group decision-making, key figures have stepped up to drive
the peace process forward.
People like Rufino Etxeberria and
Arnaldo Otegi have shown that they can carry the whole movement with
them. It helps their standing with ETA that both have seen the inside
of prison cells (Mr Otegi is still serving jail time). The
responsibility for what happens next falls as much on their shoulders
as on those of Mr Rajoy.
Source: Economist
Comments